Next-generation education is often arranged alongside governance, not within it. For example, there may be external programmes, financial literacy courses, or shadowing arrangements. The assumption is that exposure produces readiness. It rarely does, and the people the education is designed to serve are saying so clearly.
The Campden Wealth and AlTi Tiedemann Family Office Operational Excellence Report 2025 tracked satisfaction across 16 family office functions. Next-generation education finished last. Among family members (the direct recipients of these programmes) satisfaction sat at 15%. Among non-family staff observing the same function from the outside, it was at 29%. Both figures represent the lowest scores in the category. Note that the people running these programmes rated them twice as highly as the people they are running them for.
The participation data sharpens the picture. Sixty percent of the respondents said they invited the rising generation to board meetings, with 55% of the younger family members attending multi-generational gatherings. Inclusion levels are high. But less of future wealth owners have a structured way to know their point of view is considered, and only one in four have a formal vote on how things work. Heirs are present in the governance of wealth they will one day steward yet largely unable to shape what happens there.
The Governance Apprenticeship Gap
The structural problem is not that families lack commitment to next-generation education. It is that they have not built the infrastructure for it. More than two-thirds of family offices have no formal plans at all for engaging and educating the rising generation, according to the Campden/AlTi 2025 report. Among the nine engagement mechanisms tracked, from board meeting attendance to internships to junior boards, the median family office uses six. The most common mechanism is the one that requires the least organisational commitment: an invitation to attend a meeting.
Your Wealth, Our Priority: Altoo's Consolidation Power, Secure Document Management, and Seamless Stakeholder Sharing for High Net Worth Individuals. Preview Platform.
Junior boards, the structure that most directly replicates the experience of governance participation, exist in just 10% of family offices. The contrast between high attendance rates and near-absent decision-making infrastructure is not a coincidence. It reflects a model of education built around observation rather than engagement.
The consequences are visible in the preparedness data. The 2025 UBS and Agreus Family Enterprise Governance Report found that only 23% of UHNW families rate the next generation as fully or highly prepared to manage family wealth. The majority land in “somewhat prepared,” a category that functions, in practice, as acknowledgement that the problem exists without commitment to solving it.
The Curriculum Gap
What families prioritise educationally is revealing. The Campden/AlTi report asked family offices to identify their top educational priorities. The top three, purpose of family capital (62%), financial fundamentals (58%), and leadership (45%), are all legitimate and all abstract. They teach heirs how to think about wealth without connecting that thinking to the specific wealth they will inherit.
At the bottom of the seven-topic curriculum ranking sat legacy and transition planning: the roles and responsibilities of trustees and beneficiaries as well as the mechanics of governance itself.
Also underweighted (at 28%, sixth of seven) were money and relationships: navigating financial inequality between family branches, managing conflict, building a healthy relationship with wealth as adult life and marriage introduce new dynamics. The Campden/AlTi report flagged money and relationships as scoring lower than anticipated given how directly relevant these skills become as next-generation members establish their own households and social contexts.
The deeper problem, though, is not curriculum design. No curriculum can teach heirs about their portfolio — its structure, the decisions embedded in its current form, the performance record that validates or challenges the family’s investment philosophy across decades. Generic financial education, however well-designed, is generic. Contextual knowledge requires access to actual context. Heirs who have never seen the portfolio in detail, who do not know why particular custodians were chosen or how the family navigated a difficult period in private equity, are inheriting assets without inheriting the institutional memory attached to them.
Education as a Governance Function
According to the generational data, the families that prepare heirs most effectively are not those with the best external programmes. They are those that have made education a standing function within governance.
By the fifth generation, families have twice the number of engagement mechanisms as those still under first-generation leadership, according to the Campden/AlTi report. The improvement reflects decades of iteration: education that gets built into governance structure gradually becomes more sophisticated, more targeted, and more effective.
The question for families earlier in that journey is whether they have to accumulate those decades before they can close the gap. The answer can be no if the commitment is made deliberately rather than left to generational drift.
Family engagement and education is the single most frequently added service among family offices that have expanded their offering in the past two years, according to the Campden/AlTi report. Investment, administrative, and concierge functions were added less frequently. Family offices appear to be starting to recognise that education belongs inside the governance function, not alongside it.
The UBS/Agreus report provides a useful data point on what formalisation produces. Employment policies governing family participation exist in only 21% of family offices surveyed. Among those that have them, 67% reported stronger communication and joint decision-making.
Takeaway
The families that have made education a governance function treat it accordingly. There is a defined curriculum, a progression of access and responsibility, and an annual review alongside other governance practices. The next generation is not just invited to observe, it is given structured exposure to the actual decisions the family office is making with appropriate guidance and increasing responsibility over time.
Treating education as a governance function also reframes what success looks like. The measure is not whether heirs have attended the right programmes. It is whether they can engage meaningfully with the wealth, ask informed questions, interpret portfolio performance, understand the rationale behind allocation decisions, and participate as genuine contributors to governance when the time comes.
What makes that programme substantive is access. Not access to classrooms, but access to the portfolio itself — its history, its logic, its current state. Wealth consolidation platforms that provide role-based visibility into consolidated holdings, transaction history, and performance analytics give family offices the infrastructure to make education specific rather than generic.
The Altoo Wealth Platform is built to provide this type of access, which can be scoped to what each family member is ready to engage with. Structured visibility into actual wealth is an educational tool that no external programme can replicate.
Contact us for a demonstration to see how the Altoo Wealth Platform can give the next generation of your family the one thing no financial literacy programme provides: direct, structured visibility of the wealth they will one day steward.
